The reason there are adding the cl-prefix in cl-lib is that previously cl.el replaced elisp functions with the cl equivalent ones. lispm already covered that c

The reason there are adding the cl-prefix in cl-lib is that previously cl.el replaced elisp functions with the cl equivalent ones. lispm already covered that cl: is packages, not a prefix but I'd like to add one of the reasons elisp doesn't have any similar of namespaces is due RMS thiking "prefixes are better"[0] [0]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-07/msg00794.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-07/msg00...