3 ms·
You spend more time caring and hating on systemd than it takes to learn it and overcome your issues. Most everyone who hates on systemd has this problem; you c
by damm 11y ago
You spend more time caring and hating on systemd than it takes to learn it and overcome your issues.
Most everyone who hates on systemd has this problem; you could blame systemd. Or you could realize you have a problem
- victorhugo31337 11y agoI think it's a legitimate question. Systemd seems more targeted towards desktop environments where things like D-BUS are needed. I'm thinking of bastion server configurations using a distributions like CentOS where less is more. It may be worthwhile to use Sys-V which has less moving parts, fewer configuration options and thus fewer vulnerability points. Not to say that systemd cannot be hardened as well, but having a choice would have been better.
- digi_owl 11y agoOr you could adopt any number of other inits that have much the same benefits as systemd-as-init, but without all the baggage. Frankly the reason systemd even gets attention is because the likes of Gnome needs a part of it, logind, to handle logins/sessions, and that it basically absorbed udev (after udev had existed as a independent project for a decade).
- alexandrerond 11y agoMaybe some people hate systemd because they are trying to overcome its issues and in the process they have found it was utterly broken. Just saying...