I agree and, except for the "terror plots aren'the norm" conclusion, im with you. What I am driving at is that while the blanket "people" who watch fox news an

I agree and, except for the "terror plots aren'the norm" conclusion, im with you. What I am driving at is that while the blanket "people" who watch fox news and are scared of brown people label terroists as myslims, i am proposing a different idea of "distuptive event". It had nothing to do with edgecases like 9/11. Look at it like gun violence. I think people should be able to own guns, but the more people own guns, the more ahootings there are. If 0 people had guns, there would be 0 shootings. So, suppose you were (i am) willing to accept x amount of ahootings to keep this right and we know some people will legally pr illegally obtain guns and do ill with them. My point, is that eventually, people will have the same access to the strike capabilities of small governments in the 90s for very little money. I believe we should retain these rightts, we will have casualties to such freedom, but we also need to expect that as peoplehave the ability to affect global change positively, they do negatively as well. Whena group of small people have the power to go to mars for example that is great, however similarly many peoplewill have access to satellites in > 10 years. So we need to be pretty cognizant of how we handle this.