5 ms·

>One common objection to the theory of evolution claims... There is a common objection?

spacehome 11y ago
There are plenty of objections. Polls consistently show that something like 40-50% of Americans are creationists [1]. And this doesn't mean something vague like God guided evolution, but that evolution is an outright lie promoted by scientists and possibly invented by nefarious metaphysical creatures and that in any case the Earth is only a few thousand years old, so there couldn't have been time for Evolution to happen. The fact that you probably don't know these people is more than likely a testament to how people self-segregate into like-minded groups who reinforce each others' beliefs. All these Creationists have heard of evolution and have reasons not to believe it. [1] http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-h...
- meric 11y ago
  They are probably similarly amazed so many other people don't believe in God and the literal word of the Bible as much as they do.
  - bediger4000 11y ago
    Probably, but that's very much beside the point that a huge pile of evidence points towards theory of evolution being true. An argument from authority (My Holy Bible says that God exists!) is quite a bit less convincing than many lines of inquiry ending up at the same place.
  - spdionis 11y ago
    A (pretty smart) friend of mine tried to show me that scientists' findings about he Earth's age are wrong because he read aome article about errors in the estimation technique. He then argued that therefore Earth is not very old and evolution didn't have time to happen. I was amazed...
    - deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    - ionforce 11y ago
      It's quite frustrating that the illogical latch onto morsels/islands of logic that are convenient for their agenda. You can pick and choose your religion, but you can't pick and choose with logic.
- scott_s 11y ago
  The objections from such people have been fully and repeatably refuted. I doubt this new finding will cause any of them to reevaluate their position.
  - spacehome 11y ago
    You're changing the topic. The fact that such arguments are "fully and repeatably refuted" does not dissuade people from making the arguments as much as you might think.

There are plenty of objections. Polls consistently show that something like 40-50% of Americans are creationists [1]. And this doesn't mean something vague like God guided evolution, but that evolution is an outright lie promoted by scientists and possibly invented by nefarious metaphysical creatures and that in any case the Earth is only a few thousand years old, so there couldn't have been time for Evolution to happen. The fact that you probably don't know these people is more than likely a testament to how people self-segregate into like-minded groups who reinforce each others' beliefs. All these Creationists have heard of evolution and have reasons not to believe it. [1] http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-h...

meric 11y ago
They are probably similarly amazed so many other people don't believe in God and the literal word of the Bible as much as they do.
- bediger4000 11y ago
  Probably, but that's very much beside the point that a huge pile of evidence points towards theory of evolution being true. An argument from authority (My Holy Bible says that God exists!) is quite a bit less convincing than many lines of inquiry ending up at the same place.
- spdionis 11y ago
  A (pretty smart) friend of mine tried to show me that scientists' findings about he Earth's age are wrong because he read aome article about errors in the estimation technique. He then argued that therefore Earth is not very old and evolution didn't have time to happen. I was amazed...
  - deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]
  - ionforce 11y ago
    It's quite frustrating that the illogical latch onto morsels/islands of logic that are convenient for their agenda. You can pick and choose your religion, but you can't pick and choose with logic.
scott_s 11y ago
The objections from such people have been fully and repeatably refuted. I doubt this new finding will cause any of them to reevaluate their position.
- spacehome 11y ago
  You're changing the topic. The fact that such arguments are "fully and repeatably refuted" does not dissuade people from making the arguments as much as you might think.