The title is misleading. I followed the link hoping for an article about an editor willing to enforce open data, better statistics, etc. Instead, the editor is

The title is misleading. I followed the link hoping for an article about an editor willing to enforce open data, better statistics, etc. Instead, the editor is trying to shake things up in medicine and politics/policy. Based on the article, I would infer the editor is just another moralizing, do-gooder crusader trying to leverage "science".