> Then in the next chapter, 12, he falls into a sort of absurdity about the nature of interest Yes, I noticed that too. I'm not enough of an economist (obviou

> Then in the next chapter, 12, he falls into a sort of absurdity about the nature of interest Yes, I noticed that too. I'm not enough of an economist (obviously) to know what he should have said instead. It's a weakness, but I don't think it's fatal to his key point, which is that urban land values are socially created and should benefit society as a whole.