Ah yes, more propaganda supporting a surveillance state. What makes these sorts of things difficult to argue about is all a matter of how they get framed. "It'

Ah yes, more propaganda supporting a surveillance state. What makes these sorts of things difficult to argue about is all a matter of how they get framed. "It's good for a more peaceful society. You aren't violent? Right? You have nothing to worry about then! This technology will help keep you safe. You want to be safe? Right?" I'm glad to see many citizens are at least sharing their voice against this. But it reads all to much like Fresno took "big strides too fast" and if they had taken baby-steps there would have been less outrage. You have to whittle down people's liberties - not try and take them all at once! If you do it slowly enough, they don't even notice. As an aside... typo + how do they know their score? I thought only operators knew it? How does she know her threat level was elevated because she tweeted about "Rage"? >Once council member referred to a local media report saying that a woman’s threat level was elevated because she was tweeting about a card game titled “Rage,” which could be a keyword in Beware’s assessment of social media.