4 ms·
To be able to know that it's doing something wrong or mis-reading things would require some deeper understanding of what it's doing (or at least a confidence sc
by seanp2k2 11y ago
To be able to know that it's doing something wrong or mis-reading things would require some deeper understanding of what it's doing (or at least a confidence score or similar). This is why it'd likely be important for s human to be overseeing it 100% of the time, to step in and swiftly make a manual override when the autonomy doesn't realize it's about to do something stupid.
- ghaff 11y agoA lot of people don't really oversee their car's driving 100% of the time today because they're fiddling with their phones or whatever. It's completely unrealistic to expect that anyone will actively monitor their environment if there's an autopilot that works reliably the vast majority of the time. Just won't/can't happen--and has been shown in research. Indeed, why would I even want a fully autonomous driving system if I have to drive the car anyway?