4 ms·
Appreciate that you are trying to help here, but there is a lot that is simply wrong or confused in your comment. Suborbital does not imply "close to orbital"
by vpribish 11y ago
Appreciate that you are trying to help here, but there is a lot that is simply wrong or confused in your comment. Suborbital does not imply "close to orbital", and does not require an amount of energy in the neighborhood of that for orbital flight, and ballistic/intercontinental/efficient-horizontal-thrust is just a very muddled way to think about this.