George is also fairly "antique" as far as macroeconomists go. It's not too much of an exaggeration that anything from before the ~1950's is consider little mor

George is also fairly "antique" as far as macroeconomists go. It's not too much of an exaggeration that anything from before the ~1950's is consider little more than curiosities that illustrate progress of economics thought. For the most comprehensive book on the subject, see http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Macroeconomics-Origins-Development/dp/1845422082/ http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Macroeconomics-Origins-Developm...