3 ms·
I don't think that's what they're saying; they're saying that wasm has a somewhat-readable textual representation. Not a precompiled/decompiled program, a one-o
by Manishearth 11y ago
I don't think that's what they're saying; they're saying that wasm has a somewhat-readable textual representation. Not a precompiled/decompiled program, a one-one mapping from the AST to the text format. Or something.
Think of it like how assembly is to machine code, but probably more readable.
- Rusky 11y agoThe intent is exactly like assembly/machine code, though they haven't really nailed down the format yet. Current implementation(s?) just use s-exprs, though I don't think they want that to be the final form.