3 ms·
I think the title should be changed to "in GLSL", rather than "in WebGL"
by thecatspaw 11y ago
I think the title should be changed to "in GLSL", rather than "in WebGL"
- nness 11y agoI think WebGL is suitable to mention. Whilst it is strictly speaking GLSL, with a little WebGL wrapper to execture and pass parameters, it's the WebGL part which sets the users expectation that it is a live demo and functional in-browser. I don't think you'd have that same inference from GLSL alone.