3 ms·
> In many ways ES2015 is starting to look alot like other modern programming languages - that's a good thing. That depends on how you view Javascript. If you
by qewrffewqwfqew 11y ago
> In many ways ES2015 is starting to look alot like other modern programming languages - that's a good thing.
That depends on how you view Javascript.
If you consider it a programming language, the growing-up is a good thing. Making developers more productive and all that jazz. Of course, core WATs in JS are at a deep enough level that they're going nowhere (backward compatibility folks!), and anyone who's not already invested in JS should have the sense to look elsewhere.
If you consider it a runtime for delivering applications to the browser, it's really not so clearly a positive. A more complex language means more lock-in to existing runtimes, more room for bugs, more wasted engineering effort supporting the moving standard, less opportunity for lighter abstractions or more declarative assets amenable to static analysis ...
- hoodoof 11y ago>> A more complex language means more lock-in to existing runtimes, more room for bugs, more wasted engineering effort supporting the moving standard, less opportunity for lighter abstractions or more declarative assets amenable to static analysis ... Sorry you've lost me on this one - I'm sure "complex" is the wrong word and how the rest of your conclusions follow mystifies me.
- tracker1 11y agoSo, you don't use any features added to any of the languages you use in the past 20 years?