3 ms·
I wonder why it was that important (for Firefox to do something about it).
by yuhong 11y ago
I wonder why it was that important (for Firefox to do something about it).
- timonovici 11y agoThey already lost a massive chunk of their users. Do you think things will get sweeter if people start to notice that Firefox videos are crappier than on Chrome?
- yuhong 11y agoYes, but you are talking about only weeks here for one thing.
- Strom 11y agoOnly weeks? I wouldn't watch any video for even 10 seconds if it's only 360p. I would instantly start tracking down the problem and/or switch to a player that can do more.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- tamana 11y ago0th world problem, to the extreme. The bug would be fixed before at least 99.99% of users noticed and tested an alternative.
- timonovici 11y agoPut yourself in Mozilla's shoes. Why would their users have to take the punishment for no apparent reason? Wouldn't you be protective towards your users/reputation?
- protomyth 11y agoIt would be the week a lot of new computers were unboxed.
- wonkaWonka 11y agoThey'd probably like to avoid developing a reputation as a crappy video decoder. There may have been some bickering amongst the peanut gallery about it.