3 ms·
That's an improvement, however, after looking at it I must say that that's not multicast. This is multiple recipients for a message. You shouldn't need to addr
by bartman 19y ago
That's an improvement, however, after looking at it I must say that that's not multicast. This is multiple recipients for a message.
You shouldn't need to address the recipients, presence already involves people subscribing to your "presence channel". Thus your homeserver should know how to distribute the efficiently - for example by multicast. XEP-0033 just adds redundancy.
- foonamefoo 19y agoMulticast only works on either something as esoteric as the MBONE or on a local LAN/WAN. It isn't out there on the general internet, it requires too much state in the routers, so it never took off.
- mickael 19y agoThe original comment was not on transport level multicast, but on application level multicast. This is the one implement in ejabberd patches and thus works over Internet, not only LAN/WAN.
- wallflower 19y agoTransport-level mcast requires special routers.. Ah! No wonder I couldn't get the MBone videoconferencing stuff to work with Trumpet Winsock, years ago
- mickael 19y agoThe server knows how to distribute the message to multiple recipient and does that by itself. The client has of course nothing to do. ejabberd does that automatically for presence, but also for Multi-user chat and pubsub.