> Thats the problem though. You seem to imply that it's just a matter of changing the skills of the workforce. Not what I meant, but it is a much bigger discus

> Thats the problem though. You seem to imply that it's just a matter of changing the skills of the workforce. Not what I meant, but it is a much bigger discussion than Uber and ethics that involves concepts of basic income, which work can and cannot be automated, rewarding work that's not interesting, rewarding innovation, etc... The article here confuse capitalism with ethics, and tries to defend one form of capitalism vs another (debate about medaillons).