4 ms·
This article is excellent, both in the way it's written and in the underlying genius of using tenure as an indicator for credit for each paper. One interesting
by tajen 11y ago
This article is excellent, both in the way it's written and in the underlying genius of using tenure as an indicator for credit for each paper.
One interesting point is that a women-only or woman-solo paper gets more credit (9%) than a mixed-gender paper (8%).
I'm wondering why they rounded single-digit number, it's 15% imprecision (8.4% and 8.5% aren't significantly different, whereas 7.5% and 9.4% would be a great gap).
- hguant 11y agoThe paper is excellent and genius, the article is pure NYT political fluff.
- jkn 11y agoIt's too bad indeed that the labels are rounded to one digit, but at least the plot bars are from unrounded data (as the second figure with 6%, 7% and 8% bars makes it clear), so I think readers still likely get the right impression of the effect size.