4 ms·
There is very little in this article that has anything to do with doing architecture at all. This is all polemical griping about implementation—and that's devel
by bobwaycott 11y ago
There is very little in this article that has anything to do with doing architecture at all. This is all polemical griping about implementation—and that's developer territory.
Also, the initial dismissal about studying philosophy, English, film studies, or engineering—what the fuck does that have to do with anything at all related to software architecture? Sets an instant tone that what follows will likely be flimsy ad hominem arguments based on subjective shit the author personally dislikes. Useless.
- throwaway900000 11y agoAin't the Dunning-Kruger effect grand? Sadder is that the author is the submitter. He wrote this drivel and thought "awww yeaa!"
- acbart 11y agoFrom his bio page: "Self-taught all-around software-guy in his 20s. Just moved out to California. Passionate about software, psychology, self-sustaining systems, and business. Dabble in everything else (philosophy, go, reverse-engineering, painting, writing, chess, meditation, music, DVORAK). Preference for writing in fragments rather than sentences. ;)" So, philosophy is only bad if you study it in school!