4 ms·
You might have meant this, but the problem isn't strictly third-party advertising, it's advertising delivered by a third party. Nothing wrong [1] with company a
by oneeyedpigeon 11y ago
You might have meant this, but the problem isn't strictly third-party advertising, it's advertising delivered by a third party. Nothing wrong [1] with company a paying for company b to host an image and deliver it along with its content, just as offline advertising works.
[1] Well, less wrong ...
- johnhenry 11y agoYes "advertising delivered by a third party" is a more accurate description.