3 ms·

Agreed. I'm more interested in the cheap semi-quick data storage ($0.01 / GB / month) than any of the workflows they offer. I'm also not interested in learning

• eggie 11y ago
  If storage is cheap enough, and abstract, we can expect there to be a thriving ecosystem of tools to apply to it. They don't even need to be embedded in a single platform, but could be distributed, streaming, and on-demand. Here are two examples from the iobio project. A heads-up display describing a BAM (alignment) file streaming between two remote servers: http://bam.iobio.io/?bam=http://s3.amazonaws.com/iobio/NA12878/NA12878.autsome.bam&region=1 http://bam.iobio.io/?bam=http://s3.amazonaws.com/iobio/NA128... Streams another BAM from the 1000 Genomes project through two variant callers, with dynamically-updated statistics about the results. You can modify the variant quality threshold for each caller and the results are recomputed in real time: http://iobio.io/demo/variantcomparer/ http://iobio.io/demo/variantcomparer/ Edit: Very nice visualization of interesting statistics from a VCF file, provided by URL or uploaded: http://vcf.iobio.io/?vcf=http://s3.amazonaws.com/vcf.files/ALL.wgs.phase3_shapeit2_mvncall_integrated_v5.20130502.sites.vcf.gz http://vcf.iobio.io/?vcf=http://s3.amazonaws.com/vcf.files/A...