I'd love to see statistics on the failure rate of say, a traditional remote operated claymore VS an "improvised explosive device". I suspect we're reaching a po

I'd love to see statistics on the failure rate of say, a traditional remote operated claymore VS an "improvised explosive device". I suspect we're reaching a point where the line is getting blurry, with the main distinction being that most world governments have been good about restricting access to explosive precursors and monitoring purchases so IEDs have a higher failure rate since they do not generally have military grade explosives, military grade electronics, or access to the vast body of knowledge on how to blow shit up that most armies have.