> explain how having something vaguely in common with religion automatically means it's wrong. It doesn't. Something having religious undertones and something

> explain how having something vaguely in common with religion automatically means it's wrong. It doesn't. Something having religious undertones and something being incorrect are completely orthogonal, a priori. But the fact remains that discussion of supreme AI has distinctly religious undertones. Such discussions progress in, what I believe an interested observer from another culture would deduce to be, directions distinctly influenced by the West's history of monotheism, and particularly Christianity.