People voting define social good, obviously. That is the conceit of any 'proponent of Democracy'. Whoever has power decides where resources are spent. You're su

People voting define social good, obviously. That is the conceit of any 'proponent of Democracy'. Whoever has power decides where resources are spent. You're suggesting whoever currently happens to have money should have power (how convenient). I'm suggesting the people in a country should have power, which is incidentally not a new concept no matter how much you treat it as such. If you don't let the voting populace define and work towards social good, wealthy and powerful elites define social good, or more likely, pretend the concept doesn't exist or that they don't understand it as you have.