3 ms·
The multiple learning styles theory has been largely debunked. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/edu-a0037478.pdf https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/fe
by eitally 11y ago
The multiple learning styles theory has been largely debunked.
https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/edu-a0037478.pdf https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/edu-a0037478.pdf
http://www.wired.com/2015/01/need-know-learning-styles-myth-two-minutes/ http://www.wired.com/2015/01/need-know-learning-styles-myth-...
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2014/04/the_myth_of_learning_styles.html http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2014/04...
http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/12/the-myth-of-learning-styles-debunked.html http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/12/the-myth-of-learn...
http://psi.sagepub.com/content/9/3/105.abstract http://psi.sagepub.com/content/9/3/105.abstract
and I particularly like the concluding paragraph of this article:
http://anniemurphypaul.com/2013/10/forget-about-learning-styles-heres-something-better/ http://anniemurphypaul.com/2013/10/forget-about-learning-sty...
- setpatchaddress 11y agoBoy, I don't. I find it repulsive. I'm naturally a "deep learner" by that classification system, but the author of that blog seems to be implying that everyone has a choice in the matter, which does not match my observations. If it's actually true that people can be divided into those categories, it would be interesting to look more deeply, to understand why people differ in this way. Otherwise, you're just pointing at yourself and saying "look how smart I am!"