I would generally call that a very poor situational awareness by the persons holding executive power. If the higher level goal for a state is to make people fo

I would generally call that a very poor situational awareness by the persons holding executive power. If the higher level goal for a state is to make people follow the law, then starting with violent coercion is a stupid influence tactic. There are other influence tactics as well. But, if the culture is such that coercive tactics take precedence then I suppose you can have a point. I would not start to unravel this by deregulating schooling but by fixing the habits and culture of the executive personnel, though.