5 ms·
So why doesn't Google, a significant stakeholder of H.264 with both YouTube (don't want to reencode) and Android (H.264 is better on battery life due to hardwar
by ROFISH 17y ago
So why doesn't Google, a significant stakeholder of H.264 with both YouTube (don't want to reencode) and Android (H.264 is better on battery life due to hardware considerations), just sponsor Firefox's H.264 license?
- robin_reala 17y agoBecause that wouldn’t address the root issue of Mozilla’s objection: that downstream projects that use Mozilla code won’t be able to without paying for an H.264 licence themselves.