Drup: Also, if it wasn't abundantly clear (to you or others) - I believe js_of_ocaml to be perhaps the best systems language compile-to-js toolchain that I've

Drup: Also, if it wasn't abundantly clear (to you or others) - I believe js_of_ocaml to be perhaps the best systems language compile-to-js toolchain that I've ever discovered (and I've looked extensively for others) - so I hope you can fully appreciate just how valuable it continues to be, to me personally and many others. I have a question about your comment: "It's probably pretty easy to improve js_of_ocaml on that though, given the current state." Would this also require patching the compiler to preserve record field names and avoid name mangling in general? And I have a question about your comment on reddit which implies that maintaining a backend would be difficult to sustain: Do you believe that a seamlessly debuggable JavaScript backend, could generate the necessary amount of attention required to sustain such a backend, given how much more widely accessible end-end OCaml development would become as a result of its existence?