3 ms·
Well, given that Microsoft is on the list as well, 98% of all desktops are covered. The remaining 2% are welcome to purchase licensed third party codecs. I don
by DrJokepu 17y ago
Well, given that Microsoft is on the list as well, 98% of all desktops are covered. The remaining 2% are welcome to purchase licensed third party codecs.
I don't want to sound offensive but just because some tiny portion of people would prefer a free/open solution, the large majority of the people (who actually use a commrecial OS and and don't really care about the whole thing just want YouTube working on their desktop) shouldn't be "punished".
- robin_reala 17y agoMicrosoft weren’t on that list when XP came out, so it’s hardly 2% of users.
- vetinari 17y agoActually, it is new thing in Windows 7, so Vista also does not have H.264 decoder. What about turning it around? 100% has access to open decoder, and if 2% wants to use licensed codec, they can. Remember, Theora was suggested as baseline codec, not as only codec.