That's a bit reductionist on something that is inherently non-reductionist: how do you define a good problem worth solving. I believe you presented a logical l

That's a bit reductionist on something that is inherently non-reductionist: how do you define a good problem worth solving. I believe you presented a logical leap between having all the tools one could ever dream of <-> delivering scientific impact. Here's a citation: "scientific impact is a decelerating function of grant funding size". http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065263 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....