3 ms·

> If you don't tip, you're literally expecting someone to serve you for somewhere around $2-$3 an hour. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't restaurants suppose

> If you don't tip, you're literally expecting someone to serve you for somewhere around $2-$3 an hour. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't restaurants supposed to pay waiters the difference if they make less than minimum wage in tips?

s73v3r 11y ago
There is a canyon of difference between what is "supposed to" happen, and what does. And before you bring up suing or reporting or anything like that, know that those activities usually require time and money that the employee probably does not have, and will likely cause them to not continue at their job, and through rumors spread through the industry, might cause them to not be able to find another one.
- finzentive 11y ago
  Be that as it may, it is hardly reasonable that the customer bear the onus of any illegal conduct by the restaurant.
- Lawtonfogle 11y ago
  The problem is that the anger over the employer's illegal actions is now being directed to the customer. This makes it easier for the employer to get away with this because they can shield themselves better by focusing on the customers who don't tip.
  - eridius 11y ago
    Waiters are supposed to make more than minimum wage anyway. Any waiter that has to worry about whether their employer will screw them over if they earn less is already being significantly screwed over by customers.
eridius 11y ago
Waiters are expected to make over minimum wage once tips are included. Yes, if they don't reach minimum wages, then legally they're supposed to be paid the difference (though there's a vast gulf between "should" and "does", especially in a job like this where speaking up likely means getting fired). But assuming that the waiter is already reaching minimum wage this month, then refusing to tip means that the waiter is only earning $2-$3 per hour for the time spent serving you. Also, being a waiter is absolutely a job that should pay over minimum wage, so if your argument is "but at least they're making minimum wage", you're still significantly under-valuing your waiter's work. Being a waiter is hard work.
- finzentive 11y ago
  > But assuming that the waiter is already reaching minimum wage this month, then refusing to tip means that the waiter is only earning $2-$3 per hour for the time spent serving you. They cannot very well be earning less than minimum wage per hour if they already have gotten more or equal to minimum wage for the month in tips. Do you mean they are earning only $x per hour over minimum wage for serving you?

s73v3r 11y ago

There is a canyon of difference between what is "supposed to" happen, and what does. And before you bring up suing or reporting or anything like that, know that those activities usually require time and money that the employee probably does not have, and will likely cause them to not continue at their job, and through rumors spread through the industry, might cause them to not be able to find another one.

finzentive 11y ago
Be that as it may, it is hardly reasonable that the customer bear the onus of any illegal conduct by the restaurant.
Lawtonfogle 11y ago
The problem is that the anger over the employer's illegal actions is now being directed to the customer. This makes it easier for the employer to get away with this because they can shield themselves better by focusing on the customers who don't tip.
- eridius 11y ago
  Waiters are supposed to make more than minimum wage anyway. Any waiter that has to worry about whether their employer will screw them over if they earn less is already being significantly screwed over by customers.

eridius 11y ago

Waiters are expected to make over minimum wage once tips are included. Yes, if they don't reach minimum wages, then legally they're supposed to be paid the difference (though there's a vast gulf between "should" and "does", especially in a job like this where speaking up likely means getting fired). But assuming that the waiter is already reaching minimum wage this month, then refusing to tip means that the waiter is only earning $2-$3 per hour for the time spent serving you. Also, being a waiter is absolutely a job that should pay over minimum wage, so if your argument is "but at least they're making minimum wage", you're still significantly under-valuing your waiter's work. Being a waiter is hard work.

finzentive 11y ago
> But assuming that the waiter is already reaching minimum wage this month, then refusing to tip means that the waiter is only earning $2-$3 per hour for the time spent serving you. They cannot very well be earning less than minimum wage per hour if they already have gotten more or equal to minimum wage for the month in tips. Do you mean they are earning only $x per hour over minimum wage for serving you?