4 ms·
In my opinion, Sparkyfish has the better UI. I wasn't aware of iPerf when I wrote this but I can see that iPerf has more comprehensive testing. Perhaps a goo
by chrissnell 11y ago
In my opinion, Sparkyfish has the better UI. I wasn't aware of iPerf when I wrote this but I can see that iPerf has more comprehensive testing. Perhaps a good future direction is to ditch the Sparkyfish protocol and use the iPerf protocol with my UI client. That could be neat.
- NetStrikeForce 11y agoThanks for the reply! If it helps, I'm usually interested in sharing the final results with customers or colleagues over email. iPerf shows you a few things, but I'm now thinking a more comprehensive report at the end would be cool (include latency as calculated during the 3WHS? % of retransmissions from each side?).