3 ms·
This kind of tool is in my area of interest. Why should someone use Sparkyfish instead of iPerf?
by NetStrikeForce 11y ago
This kind of tool is in my area of interest.
Why should someone use Sparkyfish instead of iPerf?
- chrissnell 11y agoIn my opinion, Sparkyfish has the better UI. I wasn't aware of iPerf when I wrote this but I can see that iPerf has more comprehensive testing. Perhaps a good future direction is to ditch the Sparkyfish protocol and use the iPerf protocol with my UI client. That could be neat.
- NetStrikeForce 11y agoThanks for the reply! If it helps, I'm usually interested in sharing the final results with customers or colleagues over email. iPerf shows you a few things, but I'm now thinking a more comprehensive report at the end would be cool (include latency as calculated during the 3WHS? % of retransmissions from each side?).