5 ms·
>So if I understand correctly, OpenBazaar will be shifting costs from a central verification and fulfillment agency (Amazon, Visa, etc.) onto the buyers, seller
by SamPatt 11y ago
>So if I understand correctly, OpenBazaar will be shifting costs from a central verification and fulfillment agency (Amazon, Visa, etc.) onto the buyers, sellers, and moderators of the market?
Yes. I try to explain this a bit more here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zv6sc/sneak_peek_at_bitcoins_upcoming_killer_app_open/cype35n https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zv6sc/sneak_peek_...
> Where is this cost made up for the buyers - will they see lower prices? Wouldn't it be more expensive as moderators need to be compensated for their services?
Yes, we expect lower prices would be the main draw for buyers. The price shouldn't be made up with moderation since moderators are only paid for services rendered - if there's no dispute then they aren't even aware of the transaction happening.
>How can there be a consensus on a moderator if one party is always happy and one is always unhappy? Won't the consensus always be 50/50?
What Dr. Sanchez is trying to get at is the fact that text reviews from other parties (and explanations from the mod) will be publicly viewable. That would allow a prospect to review them and see which side they think is more legitimate.
We recognize that decentralized reputation systems are basically the holy grail of p2p systems and we don't even pretend to be solving the problem, only giving users some information to make a more informed decision. I expect that many moderators will choose to publicly identify themselves and use their IRL reputation as well.
>Last question: How will the leadership/dev of OpenBazaar be structured in the future? Will you guys develop something similar to the Linux Foundation under a non-profit charter? Will the foundation enact a transaction fee to fund itself?
No transaction fees. It's open source, so even if we wanted to do this it would likely fail because people could always fork it and remove the fee.
Right now many of the core devs are a part of a company called OB1 (I'm a co-founder). We received $1 million from Union Square Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz in order to lead development of the platform, push for network adoption, and then offer services to users on the network.
- roymurdock 11y agoCool, thanks for the response. You guys clearly know what you're getting into. Also thanks for the transparency on Union Square Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz - makes sense as Horowitz is probably the biggest bull out there on blockchain tech, which is pretty smart IMO. One last question - how big is the potential market? That is, what is your estimate of the amount that Amazon spends on buyer/fraud protection services as a percent of their yearly revenue? Is that increasing or decreasing? To me it seems like the key will be maintaining neutrality for as long as possible. Which should be reasonable as long as you continue to secure altruistic funding (ala Horowitz) from entities that are not looking for an exit on the short-medium timeframe.
- narrowrail 11y ago>as long as you continue to secure altruistic funding I've never heard of VCs being described as altruistic, and it is very far from my experience. Is this something people believe? Also, asking, "how big is the potential market?" seems inappropriate, but ymmmv.
- roymurdock 11y agoOnce someone accrues enough money, they start to think about their personal legacy - case in point, Bill Gates. Horowitz could be thinking along similar lines if he is willing to be the patron of the blockchain in order to change the future of decentralized markets/fintech forever. I've got my own estimates of the size of the market, was hoping to compare, but you're right - that's pretty sensitive info that the company probably paid for in order to pitch investors.
- MarkPNeyer 11y ago> We recognize that decentralized reputation systems are basically the holy grail of p2p systems and we don't even pretend to be solving the problem Check out this proposed solution here. Fully decentralized; it's basically personalized page-rank, for people instead of websites. https://github.com/neyer/respect https://github.com/neyer/respect