4 ms·
By "carrot", I meant "wombat". And literally the topic of this thread is an article discussing how small sample sizes, bad methodology, and statistical massagi
by trowawee 11y ago
By "carrot", I meant "wombat".
And literally the topic of this thread is an article discussing how small sample sizes, bad methodology, and statistical massaging/manipulation (depending on where you want to situate people on the stupid/evil continuum) mean that nutritional studies can't actually be trusted. The evidence that we have is all over the map.
- the_economist 11y agoThere is a huge difference between looking at nutritional studies with small sample sizes and huge populations, their diets, and the diseases they get.