3 ms·

Interesting. What do you see the usage workflow being for this, for example would it be used at a company in place of its current annual review process? The ma

Interesting. What do you see the usage workflow being for this, for example would it be used at a company in place of its current annual review process? The main page seems to be encouraging a user to get feedback for their performance but the person you describe (not an A* performer) or someone who's just trying to get by with lowest performance would not be the person who would invoke a performance review so would his/her manager invoke one for them? Also do you post the profiles and scores of everyone who is reviewed on the public site. I'm guessing some people wouldn't want that especially if they dispute a review score.

ali_ibrahim 11y ago
Thank you! The usage workflow is pretty straightforward. You are a professional. You want to ensure that your strongest traits and qualities (through verification from your colleagues) are visible to the world and to your potential employers. You make a profile here and just get feedback by your co-workers on different qualities. Based on the feedback score from you colleagues on different qualities, we graphically represent all the traits you are given feedback on. If someone is not an A* performer or has not received positive feedback on some qualities, he has total control on his profile to display that data publicly or not. Users create their own profile, so if they are not on the platform they wont receive feedback. Also, if someone decides to quit, he will deactivate his account and won't receive feedback from anyone. They can always dispute a review and our content curator checks for random unnecessarily negative feedback (All negative answers) and remove it from the system.