4 ms·
This sounds a lot like the argument for XHTML 2.0.
by mkozlows 11y ago
This sounds a lot like the argument for XHTML 2.0.
- agwa 11y agoThere was never any pressure to switch to XHTML2 - HTML4/ XHTML1 kept working fine. In contrast, IPv4 is going to become increasingly painful.
- xaduha 11y agoThere was nothing wrong with XHTML 2.0 apart from 0 support from the vendors. So I guess it's better, right? (but let's not discuss XHTML 2.0 now)