5 ms·
Drop the "house" gimmick and this could be great. I'd like to have a mobile mini-office, but it really doesn't need the shingles and all that.
by rriepe 17y ago
Drop the "house" gimmick and this could be great. I'd like to have a mobile mini-office, but it really doesn't need the shingles and all that.
- JshWright 17y agoI agree. It seems like a lot of functionality was sacrificed to try to make it look like a shed.
- mecloran 17y agoIn your opinion, which functionality do you think we lost in making it into an enclosed house (shed)? The shingles are a little gimmicky, but the roofs are for a real purpose (sound dampening). Not trying to challenge, just genuinely curious.
- JshWright 17y agoI think less focus on making it like a house would have have let you improve the build quality elsewhere (I realize this was just a "draft"). The windows seem sort of small, making it hard to communicate without walking out of the house. I'd rather see a more "convertible" design. Larger openings (that can still be closed) would be helpful for inter-house collaboration. I think the mobile enclosed office idea is great, I just wonder if there wouldn't be some benefit to thinking outside the "house." As a counterpoint, my wife thinks I'm nuts and that the house design is what makes it work ("Who would want to work in a rolling box?")