4 ms·
> gained the ability to create subdomains under a legitimate domain As lots of people in this thread have already pointed out, that's the security problem. The
by pdkl95 11y ago
> gained the ability to create subdomains under a legitimate domain
As lots of people in this thread have already pointed out, that's the security problem. The DNS zone that was delegated to you, then you have a responsibility to keep the "squatters" away.
> Traffic to this created subdomain was protected with HTTPS
Good. HTTP is obsolete. That doesn't change anything from the perspective of the victim.
> an open DoubleClick redirect
Which is yet another example of how irresponsible advertisers are creating huge attack surfaces.
From the blog they link to:
bid.g.doubleclick.net/xbbe/creative/click?r1=<malicious urlencoded URL>
It sounds like doubleclick is sending out the harmful redirect. Maybe they should verify URLs instead of blindly believing the query params?
"msxml.domdocument"
LOL
> These DV certificates can help the hacker gain legitimacy with the public.
How? "The public" probably doesn't even know what a DV certificate is.
It doesn't look like Let's Encrypt is even involved in any of the actual problems that enable this attack.
> As a certificate authority ourselves
... I guess that explains this hit piece ... /sigh/
- jmuguy 11y agoAs evidenced by the comments here, the people that count, that is system admins and developers, don't see a problem. Just more FUD from the traditional security players trying to remain relevant.
- solidninja 11y agoI finally created a HN account just to say the same thing. The security problem is that of the website itself and its choices of advertisers, not of the CA.
- Sujan 11y ago> > These DV certificates can help the hacker gain legitimacy with the public. > How? By the lock displayed in the browser that couldn't be there for free that easy before.
- cynix 11y agoStartSSL.