5 ms·

AWS have at least 32 DCs - all regions have a minimum of two data centres for proper ha. There are four more scheduled to come online this year, India and UK.

AWS have at least 32 DCs - all regions have a minimum of two data centres for proper ha. There are four more scheduled to come online this year, India and UK. If you think ovh and aws are comparable in anything but the very broadest terms you've not understood what AWS are offering.

stephenr 11y ago
It's not uncommon to use multiple providers, that way you don't need to rely on a single provider having multiple DC's in every location you want a presence. Plus you know, less SPOF.
ksec 11y ago
They are not directly comparable of course. OVH currently has 15 DC, of those additional 12, most of them are in new region, Australia, Singapore, Germany, US, and I think Japan. That will make 27 DC. This isn't say they are comparable by size. Not at all. But you make it sounds like OVH is a small player. Linode, Digital Ocean are medium size. According to Netcraft AWS being first, DO recently became second, and OVH being third. But with the lots of $5 - $20VM DO host, those are VM numbers, compared to the Server Size OVH host.
- tombrossman 11y ago
  I would also add that since OVH own and operate a large physical network[0], they can't really be compared to a hosting-only provider like DigitalOcean. This isn't 'like for like', and is only marginally useful for ranking either company. Also, for those of us looking for server space to serve a primarily Western market, OVH and AWS are most definitely comparable. AWS have a huge and impressive range of features, most of which I simply do not need (though I'm a happy OVH, AWS, and DO customer because I'm not one to put all my eggs in one basket). [0]http://weathermap.ovh.net/ http://weathermap.ovh.net/
jlgaddis 11y ago
I believe Ohio (3 AZs, IIRC) is supposed to come online in 2016 also, but I could be mistaken.
- arcdigital 11y ago
  Yep :)
nl 11y ago
Not sure if everyone realizes this, but often (outside the US at least) neither company build or owns data centers. For example, Amazon Sydney is in Equinix SY3[1]. [1] https://blog.equinix.com/2012/11/amazon-web-services-comes-to-equinix-data-center-in-australia/ https://blog.equinix.com/2012/11/amazon-web-services-comes-t... (plus I know people who saw the equipment going in)
- cjg_ 11y ago
  That's just a Direct Connect location right? Not the actual Asia Pacific (Sydney) Region.
  - nl 11y ago
    I'm guessing Equinix aren't allowed to say AWS is in their DC. But their equipment is in there, 100% guaranteed (or at least was in 2012). Edit: Here's a better reference: Equinix yesterday launched phase two of its Sydney 3 International Business Exchange datacentre facility (SY3-II) in Alexandria, with Amazon Web Services (AWS) onboard as one of its first customers.... It was only confirmed yesterday — despite it being the worst-kept secret in the industry - that it is using Equinix's SY3-II datacentre. http://www.zdnet.com/pictures/equinix-celebrates-launch-of-sy3-ii-datacentre-with-senator-conroy/ http://www.zdnet.com/pictures/equinix-celebrates-launch-of-s... I don't know for sure, but I also think that AWS Sao Paulo is in the Terremark DC.
    - bashtoni 11y ago
      AWS have two dedicated DCs ('AZs') in Sydney. For services that require quorum (Dynamo, SQS, S3 and others) they also have a private third 'AZ' in SY3-II. When you get an EC2 instance it is always in a dedicated DC, not Equinix.
- ksec 11y ago
  Wow, is that the same with OVH? Since every one of their DC are specially built by them so far. ( Although it would make sense, since 12 totally new DC in a year is quite an achievement. )
darkr 11y ago
If you count edge locations (where stuff like anycasted nameservers, cloudfront and network PoPs are hosted) as well then the DC count is significantly higher than that
- Artemis2 11y ago
  Don't forget the availability zones! Each region has 2-4 availability zones, and each of these has 1-6 datacenters. The scale of AWS is at least an order of magnitude more important than OVH's.

stephenr 11y ago

It's not uncommon to use multiple providers, that way you don't need to rely on a single provider having multiple DC's in every location you want a presence. Plus you know, less SPOF.

ksec 11y ago

They are not directly comparable of course. OVH currently has 15 DC, of those additional 12, most of them are in new region, Australia, Singapore, Germany, US, and I think Japan. That will make 27 DC. This isn't say they are comparable by size. Not at all. But you make it sounds like OVH is a small player. Linode, Digital Ocean are medium size. According to Netcraft AWS being first, DO recently became second, and OVH being third. But with the lots of $5 - $20VM DO host, those are VM numbers, compared to the Server Size OVH host.

tombrossman 11y ago
I would also add that since OVH own and operate a large physical network[0], they can't really be compared to a hosting-only provider like DigitalOcean. This isn't 'like for like', and is only marginally useful for ranking either company. Also, for those of us looking for server space to serve a primarily Western market, OVH and AWS are most definitely comparable. AWS have a huge and impressive range of features, most of which I simply do not need (though I'm a happy OVH, AWS, and DO customer because I'm not one to put all my eggs in one basket). [0]http://weathermap.ovh.net/ http://weathermap.ovh.net/

jlgaddis 11y ago

I believe Ohio (3 AZs, IIRC) is supposed to come online in 2016 also, but I could be mistaken.

arcdigital 11y ago
Yep :)

nl 11y ago

Not sure if everyone realizes this, but often (outside the US at least) neither company build or owns data centers. For example, Amazon Sydney is in Equinix SY3[1]. [1] https://blog.equinix.com/2012/11/amazon-web-services-comes-to-equinix-data-center-in-australia/ https://blog.equinix.com/2012/11/amazon-web-services-comes-t... (plus I know people who saw the equipment going in)

cjg_ 11y ago
That's just a Direct Connect location right? Not the actual Asia Pacific (Sydney) Region.
- nl 11y ago
  I'm guessing Equinix aren't allowed to say AWS is in their DC. But their equipment is in there, 100% guaranteed (or at least was in 2012). Edit: Here's a better reference: Equinix yesterday launched phase two of its Sydney 3 International Business Exchange datacentre facility (SY3-II) in Alexandria, with Amazon Web Services (AWS) onboard as one of its first customers.... It was only confirmed yesterday — despite it being the worst-kept secret in the industry - that it is using Equinix's SY3-II datacentre. http://www.zdnet.com/pictures/equinix-celebrates-launch-of-sy3-ii-datacentre-with-senator-conroy/ http://www.zdnet.com/pictures/equinix-celebrates-launch-of-s... I don't know for sure, but I also think that AWS Sao Paulo is in the Terremark DC.
  - bashtoni 11y ago
    AWS have two dedicated DCs ('AZs') in Sydney. For services that require quorum (Dynamo, SQS, S3 and others) they also have a private third 'AZ' in SY3-II. When you get an EC2 instance it is always in a dedicated DC, not Equinix.
ksec 11y ago
Wow, is that the same with OVH? Since every one of their DC are specially built by them so far. ( Although it would make sense, since 12 totally new DC in a year is quite an achievement. )

darkr 11y ago

If you count edge locations (where stuff like anycasted nameservers, cloudfront and network PoPs are hosted) as well then the DC count is significantly higher than that

Artemis2 11y ago
Don't forget the availability zones! Each region has 2-4 availability zones, and each of these has 1-6 datacenters. The scale of AWS is at least an order of magnitude more important than OVH's.