4 ms·
Two points make this solution unlikely to meet the goals the author is attempting to meet: Those who are performing whatever evil acts of information sharing a
by mdip 11y ago
Two points make this solution unlikely to meet the goals the author is attempting to meet:
Those who are performing whatever evil acts of information sharing are disallowed by the counsel will use tools that do not have a counsel who can backdoor the system.
Attempting to solve the single point-of-failure backdoor by increasing the number of points by a modest amount still falls prey to making those individuals immediately attractive targets to those who wish to get at the plaintext. Bear in mind it needn't be a technical hack once someone holds keys. It could be a social mechanism that exposes one or more of the counsel member's keys via law of an oppressive government, or other coercion (blackmail, etc).
- pdonis 11y ago> Those who are performing whatever evil acts of information sharing are disallowed by the counsel will use tools that do not have a counsel who can backdoor the system. And if everyone else is using the tools that the council can backdoor if it decides to, then anyone who uses different tools will immediately stand out. I think that's a key reason why Chaum expects that governments and law enforcement agencies are more likely to accept this type of system.