5 ms·
Well, he could also be hurting his family. Imagine a gambler betting the children's college fund. The damage is not as impactful and severe, but it is still da
by Vaskivo 11y ago
Well, he could also be hurting his family. Imagine a gambler betting the children's college fund.
The damage is not as impactful and severe, but it is still damage.
But I'm still not convinced about your parents first sentence.
- legulere 11y agoOr they might lend some money without being able to pay it back. Or they might steal money. But in my opinion the harm an addict can do to others isn't even the only problem. Addiction is a sickness that needs treatment and help. Addicts are victims first (at least partly of themselves) and only then can also be perpetrators. Living off the problems of other people (by enabling them in their addiction, not by helping them) to me personally is morally questionable. It might be a bit of a cultural thing though, as here in Europe there isn't as much emphasis on the idea that everyone needs to take their luck in their own hands as there is in the US.
- Vaskivo 11y agoSure, I agree. I also think gambling is a health problem. I find your last paragraph interesting. I too, am European. But there are lots of cultures in Europe. To me, the word "responsability" struck me as being very strong. As a portuguese, we are sociably incentivised to help each other out but it usually goes as far as helping a "friend of a friend". We have almost a "helping out" economy, that I believe comes from the hardships from our parents and grandparents during the middle of the century. And it's how we make bonds with each other. But when someone can't or doesn't want to help, it's OK. The way you phrased it turned a "could do" and "might do" to a "must do".