3 ms·
Well, let's find out just how true this is. As someone else remarked, if you want to hack, get the dev kit and start hacking (yes, $99/year; think of it as the
by cpr 17y ago
Well, let's find out just how true this is.
As someone else remarked, if you want to hack, get the dev kit and start hacking (yes, $99/year; think of it as the tinkerer's software upgrade; we've already hashed that out elsewhere on HN).
I also think some of us should start submitting things like Squeak ports (with suitable UI upgrades for touch) as educational apps. I'll bet Apple would let 'em through, because they're no threat to the ecosystem.
I know there are simple programming languages out there on the App Store (e.g., some calculators allow Fortran-like expressions, etc.), so there's not really a ban on programming environments.
In fact, I think the ban in place on scripting language is precisely and exactly to keep Flash off the machine, and I don't blame Apple for wanting to keep that barrier high.
Anything else is unlikely to get stopped.
Yes, yes, it's sad that we have to go through the gatekeeper, etc. We've hashed that out as well.
But I think in the end that tinkerers can win on this machine if they're determined enough, even without jailbreaking.
- orangecat 17y agoApple has already rejected a Commodore 64 emulator because it allowed access to the BASIC interpreter. Web apps are the only alternate execution environment they'll allow.
- cpr 17y agoOK, then someone needs to make a Squeak-like Javascript programming environment, using only the built-in JS machinery. Can't see how they could complain about that.
- Psyonic 17y agoYou can't develop on the device though; you also need a mac, so it's not the same.