4 ms·
MPL is pretty different IIRC. Must open source modified files, or something along those lines
by yoklov 11y ago
MPL is pretty different IIRC. Must open source modified files, or something along those lines
- dtech 11y agoYes, in addition you can statically link MPL code, which you can't do with LGPL. One-sentence summary: MIT: Do whatever you want BSD: Do whatever you want, don't use our name APL: Do whatever you want, don't sue us for patents MPL: Do whatever you want, as long as you release modifications to the original source files LGPL: You can use this as long as you publish changes to the library and dynamically link it in software with a non-(L)GPL license. GPL: Any source code connected to this to this code must also be GPL.
- rms_returns 11y agoYes, pretty apt summary of what each license does.
- __david__ 11y ago> LGPL: You can use this as long as you publish changes to the library and dynamically* link it in software with a non-(L)GPL license. * or, crazily enough, provide an object file or files that you can re-statically link against the LGPLed source.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]