3 ms·
Or because (1) the mechanisms for enforcement are weak at the state level, (2) because you're not controlling for other factors that increase crime and (3) the
by Steko 11y ago
Or because (1) the mechanisms for enforcement are weak at the state level, (2) because you're not controlling for other factors that increase crime and (3) the fact that massive gun violence has a direct causal link to more gun laws, you could reject the idea of state stats based on their "gun laws" being very meaningful and look at national stats, for example:
http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/gunsnosa.jpg http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/gunsnosa.jpg
How about a useful state stat:
http://www.motherjones.com/files/gun-ownership-vs-gun-deaths_2.png http://www.motherjones.com/files/gun-ownership-vs-gun-deaths...
- karzeem 11y agoThe correlation disappears (when comparing the 50 states, or all countries, or all OECD countries) when you look at all homicides, not just homicides by shooting. In other words, there is no correlation between guns per capita and overall homicide rate.