5 ms·
'Do with' not 'do in'. For example, there could be an ether-tcp that transports data using unused header bytes. Now factually you don't send data 'in' TCP heade
by kang 11y ago
'Do with' not 'do in'. For example, there could be an ether-tcp that transports data using unused header bytes. Now factually you don't send data 'in' TCP header so TCP-ether might seem better, but actually you can send data 'with' TCP and thus TCP-ether is redundant.
Think of any Ethereum usecase and you can do it with bitcoin.
- aakilfernandes 11y agox of 1,000 multisig, where each signature is controlled by a tradable token
- kang 11y agoSchnorr Signatures plus Colored coins
- wolfgke 11y agoAren't these extensions to the Bitcoin protocol (rather than core of it)? This question is curious interest, not a counterargument to yours.
- kang 11y agoVoice can be transmitted as packets using IP, but is VOIP an extension of IP or core use of it? Well, I guess we can call it either, because the end result is similar (but the side-effects are not).
- aakilfernandes 11y agoI am under the impression that colored coins can't be used as inputs in a multisig. Also, can you expand on Schnorr Signatures
- kang 11y agoThey can be, depends on how they have been colored. 1-of-4,294,967,296 multisig is doable in bitcoin theoretically using Schnorr signatures https://blockstream.com/2015/08/24/treesignatures/ https://blockstream.com/2015/08/24/treesignatures/
- ItsMattyG 11y ago>Think of any Ethereum usecase and you can do it with bitcoin. Yes, but it's a lot harder. Look at for instance the colored coins project vs. implementing a custom token on ethereum.