3 ms·
Well, there's "stripping out identifiers" and then there's "FBI-proof OPSEC" -- no one is going to run your word corpus through stylometric analysis, removing o
by Wingman4l7 11y ago
Well, there's "stripping out identifiers" and then there's "FBI-proof OPSEC" -- no one is going to run your word corpus through stylometric analysis, removing obvious links should be enough.
Makes me wonder if you could implement the exporting of a "review" version in LaTeX, similar to a debug mode -- set a flag, and any content with an {ID} wrapper around it gets left out or is substituted for something anonymous.
- Fomite 11y agoI don't think it's "FBI-proof OPSEC" to note that there are many things in a journal article that will give away the identity of the author. While you can say "Remove obvious links", to many experts $Topic in $Location is enough to allow a pretty good guess of whose lab its out of. Or the name of a long running study. And I'm not going to maintain a whole separate Github account to anonymize code distribution.