5 ms·
Plus: The algorithm thought I was 24 years old. I'm actually 32. Minus: I got the lowest rating possible. Haha, terribly depressing feedback before a date.
by colmvp 11y ago
Plus: The algorithm thought I was 24 years old. I'm actually 32.
Minus: I got the lowest rating possible. Haha, terribly depressing feedback before a date.
- nilkn 11y agoDon't feel too bad -- I ran a photo of Brad Pitt through it and he merely got a "Nice". Granted, I tried a second one and he got "Godlike". I wonder how sensitive the results are to general lighting in the photo.
- madaxe_again 11y agoI ran lichtenstein's m-m-maybe, and it returned stunning, and 26, which is probably about right, even if it's a copy of a comic.
- colmvp 11y agoI think ethnicity does play some role too (which maybe works with the lighting hypothesis?). I put pictures of really attractive Asian guys (specifically men who honestly have a lot of diehard female fans who are interested in them) and at best they got "Nice"
- analyst74 11y agoThis is actually a very interesting effect -- it exposes opinions people are generally not comfortable at expressing, for fear of being labeled as racist or something. Sadly, asian guys are considered much less attractive than our female counterparts in Switzerland. On a more positive note, now I know if a swiss girl likes me, she's probably not superficial. lol
- madaxe_again 11y agoExperimented more - it appears to be strongly influenced by facial expression. If I have a straight face, I'm hmm or OK. If I scowl, I'm nice. If I grin like an axe-wielding maniac, I'm stunning. Then again, that bears up in reality. People who smile are perceived as more attractive.
- samstave 11y agoI'm 41, it thinks I am 33! YAY!