I just love how some guy, who by his own admission read a little Wikipedia on the topic, is critiquing a statistical method. It would make for a much stronger

I just love how some guy, who by his own admission read a little Wikipedia on the topic, is critiquing a statistical method. It would make for a much stronger argument if he actually showed some numbers where people are getting the priors wrong. That is, how often people get the priors wrong and the probability of mistake if they used a different strategy more commonly used in the field.