4 ms·
Explaining xkcd's “missing 11th of the month”
- _ihaque 11y agoAn interesting exploration of OCR and its interaction with the history of typography.
- WorldMaker 11y agoVery interesting. I'm curious if some of the particular cases of this are an accidental "ReCAPTCHA effect" as those get filled out with no surrounding context plus whatever context the user brings to it (programmers/mathematician-trained brains mentally prioritizing pattern matching nth over 11th). Certainly anecdotally I feel I've made the lith and nth 'mistakes' in ReCAPTCHA attempts.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- kazinator 11y agoThe author makes no mention of the word "eleventh". "January eleven" and "January eleventh" do occur. The contribution is minor, but everything counts. In English, we also say "11th of January" not only "January 11th". ngrams comparison: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=11th+of+January%2CJanuary+11&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2C11th%20of%20January%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CJanuary%2011%3B%2Cc0 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=11th+of+Januar... This usage was more popular until around 1860, then it declined. The "n-th of Month" syntactic variation deserves a spot in the analysis, yet I see no mention of it.