2 ms·
> because then you'll simply concentrate all the wealth in corporate structures that transcend the death of their owners. That's OK, as long as the ownership o
by tomp 11y ago
> because then you'll simply concentrate all the wealth in corporate structures that transcend the death of their owners.
That's OK, as long as the ownership of these structures is dispersed (as seems to be the case now for many public companies, which are owned by pension funds and/or sovereign wealth funds). That would also prevent nepotism.